Home / Blog / CBP One Parole Ruling

Federal Judge in Boston Restores Parole for 900,000 CBP One Migrants

What Happened

On April 1, 2026, U.S. District Court Judge Allison Burroughs in Boston issued a landmark ruling that the Department of Homeland Security acted unlawfully when it terminated the immigration parole of nearly 900,000 migrants who had entered the United States through the CBP One mobile app program. The ruling immediately restores parole status and work authorization for affected individuals.

Judge Burroughs found that "when Defendants terminated the impacted noncitizens' parole without observing the process mandated by statute and by their own regulations, they took action that was 'not in accordance with law.'" The decision vacated all of the parole terminations and ordered federal officials to restore parole for everyone in the affected class.

Key Takeaway: If you or someone you know entered the United States through the CBP One app between May 16, 2023 and January 19, 2025, and received a termination notice from DHS, your parole status and work authorization may now be restored under this ruling. Consult an immigration attorney to understand how this applies to your specific situation.

Background: What Was the CBP One Program?

The CBP One mobile app was launched in 2023 as a way for migrants waiting in Mexico to schedule an appointment at a U.S. port of entry along the southern border. After being vetted and screened, approved applicants were granted parole to enter the country while their asylum claims were processed in immigration court.

Between May 16, 2023 and January 19, 2025, approximately 900,000 people used this system to enter the U.S. lawfully. These individuals came from a range of countries, with significant numbers from Venezuela, Cuba, Haiti, and Nicaragua.

The Trump administration shut down the CBP One program in January 2025 upon taking office. Then, in April 2025, DHS sent mass emails to affected migrants notifying them that their parole had been revoked. The emails told them "it is time for you to leave the United States." This mass termination stripped parole holders of their legal status and their ability to work, leaving hundreds of thousands of people in immediate legal limbo.

What the Judge Found

Judge Burroughs determined that the mass termination of parole violated federal law on several grounds. Under the Immigration and Nationality Act, DHS is required to follow specific procedures before revoking an individual's parole. Those procedures include providing individualized notice and an opportunity to respond. Instead, DHS sent a blanket email to all 900,000 people simultaneously, with no individualized review of their circumstances.

The ruling also found that DHS failed to follow its own regulations. Federal agencies are bound by the rules they create, and when DHS bypassed its established process for terminating parole, the court found the action was arbitrary and contrary to law.

What This Means for Affected Immigrants

The ruling has several immediate and practical implications for people who entered through CBP One:

Important: The government has called this ruling "blatant judicial activism" and is expected to appeal. The legal situation could change quickly. If you are affected by this ruling, it is critical to speak with an immigration attorney as soon as possible to understand your rights and next steps while the ruling stands.

Why This Matters in Massachusetts

This ruling was issued by a federal judge sitting in Boston, and its impact reaches deeply into communities across Massachusetts. The state has large populations of immigrants from Haiti, Venezuela, and other countries whose nationals used the CBP One program in significant numbers.

Massachusetts is also experiencing heightened immigration enforcement. According to WBUR, ICE has made more than 7,000 arrests in the state since the start of the current administration, nearly five times the rate during the final stretch of the prior administration. Arrests have swept through courthouses, federal buildings, and the streets of cities and towns across the Commonwealth. The largest numbers of those arrested have been from Brazil and Guatemala.

For the thousands of CBP One parolees living in Massachusetts, this ruling provides critical breathing room. Many of these individuals had been working, paying taxes, sending their children to school, and building lives here. When DHS revoked their parole, they were left with no legal status and no clear path forward. This ruling changes that, at least for now.

What You Should Do If You Are Affected

If you entered the United States through the CBP One app between May 2023 and January 2025, here are the steps you should take:

Frequently Asked Questions

Does this ruling apply to everyone who used CBP One?
The ruling applies to migrants who entered the U.S. through the CBP One app between May 16, 2023 and January 19, 2025, and whose parole was subsequently terminated by DHS. If you used CBP One and received a termination notice, this ruling likely applies to you. Consult an attorney to confirm.
Can ICE still arrest or deport me even though my parole is restored?
Parole restoration provides legal status, but it does not make you immune from enforcement actions if you have other issues in your immigration case, such as a criminal conviction or a final order of removal from a separate proceeding. However, if your only basis for removal was the parole termination, this ruling significantly strengthens your position. An attorney can evaluate your individual circumstances.
What happens if the government wins on appeal?
If the government successfully appeals this ruling, the parole terminations could be reinstated. This is why it is important to work with an attorney who can help you explore all available forms of immigration relief, including asylum, TPS, or other protections that may apply to your case, rather than relying solely on this ruling.
I am an employer. Can I rehire or continue to employ someone affected by this ruling?
If an employee's parole and work authorization have been restored by this ruling, they should be eligible to work. However, you should verify their current employment authorization documents and consult with an immigration attorney or your HR counsel to ensure compliance with I-9 requirements. The situation may evolve as the government appeals.
I entered through CBP One but I am not from Venezuela, Cuba, Haiti, or Nicaragua. Does this apply to me?
Yes. The ruling applies to all individuals who entered through the CBP One program during the covered period, regardless of country of origin. The program served migrants from many countries across the globe.

Related Articles

Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Immigration law is complex, and individual cases vary widely. The information in this article is accurate as of the date of publication but the legal situation surrounding this ruling is evolving rapidly as the government is expected to appeal. This article does not create an attorney-client relationship. If you are affected by this ruling, please consult with a qualified immigration attorney who can evaluate your specific situation and provide advice tailored to your circumstances.

Affected by the CBP One ruling?

If you or someone you know entered the U.S. through CBP One and received a parole termination notice, I can help you understand your rights and next steps. Contact me for a free, confidential consultation.

Schedule Your Free Consultation